New coronavirus traceability report released

“It’s highly unlikely that the new coronavirus will pass through the laboratory.” On March 30, who said so in its joint China who study on the traceability of new coronavirus

.

However, it never occurred to me that as soon as the voice of science came to an end, a group of Western politicians and media full of political prejudice began to go hysterical again

.

Who publishes China who joint study on the traceability of new coronavirus

.

Source: Xinhua News Agency   1

.

From January 14 to February 10, 17 Chinese experts and 17 foreign experts formed a joint expert group to Wuhan for 28 days to carry out the Chinese part of the research on the traceability of new coronavirus, and wrote the Research Report on this basis

.

Yesterday, this nearly 300 page research report was published for the first time, mainly giving the following conclusions: first, the new coronavirus “is more likely” or “very likely” to pass through the intermediate host, “may” or “more likely” to pass directly, “may” pass through the cold chain food, “very unlikely” pass through the laboratory; Second, the South China seafood market in Wuhan is not the original origin of the new coronavirus

.

At present, the role of the market in the spread of the epidemic situation and how the virus is introduced into the market “have not been determined”; Thirdly, the report suggests that early cases should be searched in a wider global scope, and retrospective studies should be conducted on relevant cold chains, including “further joint review of respiratory disease data during the October 2019 world military games”

.

Even who director general Tan Desai said: “this report is an important start, telling us that we must carry out traceability research according to scientific guidelines.” But some people really didn’t take science seriously – before the report was published, the Wall Street Journal published an open letter, which was said to be jointly signed by “26 scientists”, slandering that the expert group was “unable to conduct a comprehensive investigation independently” in China and demanding that the expert group “draw a clear line” with China

.

Last week, high-level US government officials also expressed “special concern” about the upcoming report, saying that “the Chinese government obviously helped to write this report.”

.

Now, before the report is released, the United States has issued a joint statement with 13 countries including Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea and the United Kingdom, claiming that “there is doubt about the content of the report” and “the report lacks complete data”

.

The associated press said, “this report has been repeatedly delayed, which makes people doubt whether China is trying to distort its conclusions.” AFP simply dragged the WHO into the mire, accusing the who of accommodating China

.

Whatever you say, some people just want China to carry the pot

.

White House spokesman Shaqi falsely claimed that “the WHO report lacks complete data”

.

Photo source: American media II   How to pull? First of all, some Western politicians and media accuse China of “not cooperating and not cooperating” in the traceability work

.

Even if it cooperates, it is also “limited and not comprehensive”, resulting in “not independent and distorted” research conclusions

.

As a matter of fact, it is obvious to all that China has contributed a lot to global epidemic prevention and whether it can cooperate with tracing investigation

.

At the beginning of March, the spokesman of the Chinese Ministry of foreign affairs made it clear that the list of who’s international expert group was completely put forward by the who side, the experts’ demand for field visits in Wuhan was put forward by the expert group itself, the interviewees and interview contents were independently determined by the expert group on the spot, and the post event report was also drafted by the expert group itself

.

Peter dassack, a member of the expert group and an American virologist, said two months ago that the expert group had given the Chinese side the list of places they wanted to go and objects they wanted to talk to, and their requirements were met one by one

.

This degree of openness made him “unexpected”

.

Shimadu noted that the news was widely reported by many Western media, including the associated press and the Wall Street Journal

.

Not only that, China also mobilized a large number of technical personnel to collect data and information for the expert group, showing the original data that need special attention one by one

.

At the who press conference yesterday, ambarek, head of the foreign side of the expert group, made it very clear: just look at the volume and amount of data in this report, we can see how deep and close the cooperation between who and China is

.

Seeing that the routine of “open your eyes and tell lies” is not feasible, the New York Times and other foreign media said that the scientific report did not “take into account the hidden worries of the West about the Chinese government” and “Conspired” with China, making people “very disappointed”

.

The logic of the “strange” let uncle Dao speechless: because the expert group based on the facts, did not come to “blame” China’s argument, not to mention the origin of the virus political speculation, failed to successfully transfer the Western epidemic out of control contradictions, some people are anxious to jump

.

At present, the origin of the new coronavirus is still inconclusive, and the cold war thinking of “asking right and wrong to stand in line” is not that the “presumption of guilt” against China is being pursued? After the release of the report, there was a more wonderful voice: an American scholar who had never visited Wuhan insisted that the peer research was “unconvincing”, and Redfield, former director of the CDC, insisted that “the virus came from Wuhan laboratory” without providing any evidence

.

In this regard, the Russian “independent” has a saying that can be called “human soberness”: “in the eyes of some people, attacking China never needs evidence.” This reminds us that at the beginning of the epidemic, the western media, which always boasted of objectivity and impartiality, was full of the headlines of “China virus” and “the narrative of the rise of a great power was eclipsed”, and provoked the topic of “China’s epidemic once again proves that the Chinese are the sick man of East Asia”

.

It’s just that the later “plot” disappointed the Anti China forces

.

They didn’t want to face the fact that they were beaten in the face

.

Ambalek, head of the foreign side of the expert group, expressed his thanks to the people of Wuhan

.

Photo source: China Daily 3  “ The problem of virus traceability is like a huge jigsaw puzzle

.

The work of the expert group in Wuhan is just a small part of it

.

Now that the first jigsaw puzzle is in place, it’s time to add others

.

” Michael Ryan, who’s head of the health emergency program, said

.

This report proposes to further carry out relevant traceability studies in countries and regions with positive results of sars-cov-2 detection in sewage, serum, human or animal tissues / swabs and other sars-cov-2 before the end of 2019

.

Virus traceability is a scientific issue

.

We should adhere to scientific thinking, carry out research cooperation based on evidence, and complete the global anti epidemic task in an open spirit

.

Politicizing scientific issues will only undermine global anti epidemic efforts and expose the prejudice and selfishness of some Western politicians and media

.

At the who press conference on March 30, ambarek sincerely expressed his thanks to the people of Wuhan, saying that the people of Wuhan had provided important help to the traceability of the new coronavirus, “without any concealment.”

.

In a report on the same day, the German news agency said that “a large number of scientists are defending China’s virus tracing work” compared with the political attacks by politicians from the beginning

.

As of press release, CNN and other media are still “concerned” about the research methods and process of the WHO report

.

Mr

.

Dao can’t help asking: China has set an example for tracing the source of the virus

.

When can some countries with tens of thousands of new confirmed cases per day be as open and transparent as China and invite the WHO Expert Group to visit their own countries? It can be difficult

.

Because the louder their voices of opposition, the more weak they are

.

  Article / edited by Dian Cang Jushi / Jiuduan.

.